• Blog Post

    North Carolina Business Court Weighs in on Enforceability of Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreements Post-Merger

               It is well-settled law that adequate consideration is required to create binding restrictive covenants such as non-compete agreements.  Generally, such agreements are entered at the start of an employment relationship, and the new employment itself constitutes consideration.  In North Carolina, continued employment following a merger of two companies does not satisfy the consideration requirement.  In a recent decision, the North Carolina Business Court (“NCBC”) confronted the very issue.[1]             In January 2012, AmeriGas Propane, Inc., a propane company that services over two million residential and commercial customers nationwide, merged with Shaw L.P. Gas. Ermon Coffey, an employee of Shaw, and…

  • Blog Post

    Estates of the Deceased “Wilmington Ten” Barred From Petitioning for Remuneration Payments for Wrongful Convictions

              In 1971, amidst heated racial confrontations following court-ordered desegregation of public schools, Mike’s Grocery Store in Wilmington, North Carolina was firebombed.  Police and fire rescue personnel responding to the scene were attacked by the perpetrators, and the event resulted in the arrest and conviction of nine black men and one white woman, collectively dubbed the “Wilmington Ten.”  The incident received national attention and several articles were published in the late 1970’s on the trial and its aftermath.  In 1980 the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned their convictions, determining that the defendants were denied their right to constitutional due process as a result of prosecutorial…

  • Blog Post

    Caveat to a Caveat to a Will: North Carolina Court of Appeals Offers Non-Binding Opinion

              In October the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion addressing the circumstances under which it is appropriate to grant a motion to dismiss in the context of a will caveat.[1]  A caveat is a legal challenge to the probate of a will when there is confusion or disagreement as to the interpretation of the will.  The three issues addressed were: (1) can a caveat challenge only a part of a will; (2) can an executor who presents a will for probate later file a caveat; and (3) can one who accepts a benefit under a will later challenge its validity via caveat?…

  • Blog Post

    North Carolina Business Court Suggests a Willingness to Impose a Fiduciary Duty on Minority Shareholders

              The North Carolina Business Court recently issued an opinion in which it suggested a willingness to adopt a position that “controlling” minority shareholders owe a fiduciary duty to their fellow minority shareholders.[1]             The case arose out of a transaction between Reynolds American, Inc. (“Reynolds American”) and Lorillard, Inc. (“Lorillard”), funded in part by shares purchased by Reynolds American’s largest shareholder, British American Tobacco, p.l.c. (“British American”).   Reynolds American was formed in 2004 when R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company acquired British American’s United States subsidiary.  British American obtained a forty-two percent (42%) stake in the newly formed Reynolds American.   At that…