• Blog Post

    RULE 38: NO SUBSTITUTION FOR GOOD JUDGMENT

    The recent North Carolina Court of Appeals decision in Weishaupt-Smith v. Town of Banner Elk represents North Carolina’s first appellate ruling interpreting Rule 38(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, which provides the second of three (3) categories in which substitution of a party to a dispute on appeal is permitted.  Although this rule was adopted in 1975, courts remained silent on its interpretation until Weishaupt-Smith.   Rule 38 Substitution of Parties   Rule 38 provides three specific categories under which a party to a dispute on appeal or while appeal is pending may be substituted.  The first, Rule 38(a), permits substitution when a party dies but the…