Skip to content
Blog

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Trey
    • Rhonda
  • Practice Areas
    • Commercial/Complex Business Litigation
    • Trust & Estate Litigation
    • Condemnation & Eminent Domain
    • Appellate Law
    • Guardian & Incompetency Proceedings
    • Creditor & Consumer Rights Litigation
    • Employment Law
    • Landlord/Tenant Disputes
    • Professional Malpractice
    • Construction Litigation
    • Partition Proceedings
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Law Pay
    • Invoice/Consultation
    • Retainer
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Trey
    • Rhonda
  • Practice Areas
    • Commercial/Complex Business Litigation
    • Trust & Estate Litigation
    • Condemnation & Eminent Domain
    • Appellate Law
    • Guardian & Incompetency Proceedings
    • Creditor & Consumer Rights Litigation
    • Employment Law
    • Landlord/Tenant Disputes
    • Professional Malpractice
    • Construction Litigation
    • Partition Proceedings
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Law Pay
    • Invoice/Consultation
    • Retainer
Blog Post

Non-Conforming Payable on Death Accounts Can Survive as Common Law Tentative or “Totten” Trusts

August 12, 2015

                On August 4, 2015, the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued a ruling clarifying that when a grantor seeks to create a statutory payable on death (“POD”) account, but fails to satisfy the statutory provisions, he/she can still rely on the existence of a common law tentative trust or “Totten” trust as an alternative.[1]

 

             The Totten trust, sometimes called a “poor man’s will,” was established after the 1904 New York Court of Appeals decision, In the Matter of Totten. The requirements to create a Totten trust are: (1) sufficient words to show intention to create the trust; (2) a definite subject; and (3) an ascertained object.  The owner retains complete control over the Totten trust until his death and it is fully revocable.  Since Totten trusts do not require the formalities necessary to execute a valid will or other testamentary documents, they are easy to set up and easy to modify.  Usually such arrangements are used to transfer modest amounts of money after death by someone who cannot otherwise afford to establish a legal mechanism to do so.

 

           Before his death, Mr. Nelson called the local State Employees Credit Union (SECU) branch requesting to remove $85,000.00 from his personal account to create a new POD account, listing his daughter, Martha, as the beneficiary.  The financial services officer at the branch recognized his voice, collected the necessary information to open a statutory POD account, and mailed Mr. Nelson the appropriate forms to sign and authorize the account.  Mr. Nelson signed the form, acknowledging that he received a copy of the rules and regulations governing the account, but he never did received them.

 

          After Mr. Nelson’s death, Martha was informed of the POD account and withdrew the $85,000.00.   Martha’s siblings sued her and the SECU, alleging the POD account failed to comply with the statute, and was therefore invalid. While the trial court agreed Mr. Nelson and the SECU failed to comply with the requirements to create a statutory POD account, it ruled he nonetheless created a Totten trust, which had the same effect.  The North Carolina Court of Appeals agreed.

 

             The Court of Appeals noted that ordinarily when a statute regulates the subject of any common law rule, the statute automatically supplants the common law, becoming the authoritative law of the State.  The POD statute creates the same beneficiary rights in an account as a common law tentative trust.  However, the North Carolina General Assembly specifically chose not to displace the existing common law.  The POD statute provides, “ [t]his section shall not be deemed exclusive.  Deposit accounts not conforming to this section shall be governed by other applicable provisions … or the common law, as appropriate.”[2] Since the legislature expressed a clear intent to create the POD statute as an alternative to the common law, non-conforming accounts such as the one at issue can otherwise become valid Totten trusts.

 

 

[1] Nelson v. State Employees Credit Union, N.C. App. No. COA14-1393 (August 4, 2015).

[2] N.C. Gen. Stat. § 54-109.57(a1).

Common Law Tentative Trustfiduciary dutyNorth Carolina Court of AppealsNorth Carolina General AssemblyPayable on Death AccountPOD accountRevocable trustSECUTotten Trust
By Trey Lindley

Related Posts

Five Questions About Construction Liens

November 2, 2016

OPPOSING COUNSEL, WILL YOU BE MY VALENTINE?

February 14, 2019

The Strict Blue Pencil Doctrine is Alive and Well in NC Courts

March 23, 2016

Archives

  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
Savona Theme by Optima Themes