• Blog Post

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty vs. Constructive Fraud – Which Claim Do You Have?

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty:               A fiduciary is an individual or corporation to whom property or power is entrusted for the benefit of another.  Fiduciaries must prudently care for any such assets, and may also have a number of additional duties, depending on the nature of their fiduciary relationship.  These duties include, without limitation: a duty of good faith and fair dealing, a duty of loyalty, a duty of impartiality, a duty to delegate, a duty to inform, and a duty to maintain adequate records.             To succeed on a breach of fiduciary duty claim, the plaintiff must prove…

  • Blog Post

    North Carolina Business Court Suggests a Willingness to Impose a Fiduciary Duty on Minority Shareholders

              The North Carolina Business Court recently issued an opinion in which it suggested a willingness to adopt a position that “controlling” minority shareholders owe a fiduciary duty to their fellow minority shareholders.[1]             The case arose out of a transaction between Reynolds American, Inc. (“Reynolds American”) and Lorillard, Inc. (“Lorillard”), funded in part by shares purchased by Reynolds American’s largest shareholder, British American Tobacco, p.l.c. (“British American”).   Reynolds American was formed in 2004 when R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company acquired British American’s United States subsidiary.  British American obtained a forty-two percent (42%) stake in the newly formed Reynolds American.   At that…

  • Blog Post

    Rule 11 Sanctions Imposed for Improper Breach of Fiduciary Duties Claims Against Rank-and-File Employees

               In September 2011, Southeast Air Charter, Inc. (“Southeast Air”) brought suit against three (3) employees (“Defendants”) alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud.   The North Carolina Business Court (“NCBC”) determined all defendants were rank-and-file employees of Southeast Air and therefore could not be subject to the breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud claims.  As such, Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys were subject to Rule 11 sanctions for bringing these claims without any factual basis.  In determining the appropriate amount of sanctions and the allocation of attorneys’ fees incurred by Defendants, Judge James Gale, Chief Special Superior Court Judge of the NCBC,…