Chipotle is currently embroiled in a multi-year wage theft lawsuit. In 2014, approximately 10,000 current and former Chipotle employees filed a class action lawsuit alleging the company failed to compensate employees for work they performed “off the clock”. The employees further claim these off the clock hours are required by Chipotle to meet company-wide labor and payroll budgets. Chipotle responded that 2,814 of the workers should be dismissed from the lawsuit because their employment contracts include a waiver or their right to join class action lawsuits and an agreement to resolve all disputes via arbitration. The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling last month which lends support to…
-
-
North Carolina Business Court: Employment Agreements Automatically Terminate Upon the Sale of a Company
A recent decision by the North Carolina Business Court held that an employment agreement automatically terminates upon the asset sale of one company to another, despite continued employment with the purchasing company.[1] In 2001, Andrew Lund executed an employment agreement with his then-employer, Southern Staircases of North Carolina, Inc. The agreement contained several post-employment restrictions regarding disclosing confidential information and soliciting current and future customers. The agreement also contained a duty of loyalty provision to “devote his entire working time, attention, and energies to the business of the Company and . . . [to] not be engaged in any other business…
-
NCBC: Fifty-Mile Customer Based Geographic Restriction Makes Non-Compete Agreement Unreasonable
In August, the North Carolina Business Court (“NCBC”) determined a non-compete agreement was unreasonable because of its overly broad geographic restriction, and denied Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction to prohibit a former employee from competing with it.[1] In North Carolina, non-compete agreements are generally disfavored and strictly construed against the drafting party. A non-compete agreement must be (1) in writing; (2) made a part of the employment contract; (3) supported by consideration; (4) reasonable both as to time and territory; and (5) no broader than necessary to protect the employer’s interest.[2] In determining the reasonableness of such agreements, the…
